Managing Common Maize Ear Rots

Maize is one of the most important agricultural crops in South Africa, with approximately 2.3 million hectares planted annually. Managing diseases is just one of the many aspects of production that maize producers need to consider each season. While the symptoms of many of the leaf disease pathogens are often obvious from early in the season, the symptoms and effect of diseases infecting the grain are often only fully realised at harvest time, long after any opportunity to try and remedy the infection/situation has passed.

Ear rots impact the returns of the crop in two ways: firstly, as a direct yield loss. Ears infected by these diseases may be destroyed, or have significantly lighter kernels, resulting in less tonnage per hectare. The second impact is the financial penalty that may be imposed due to down-grading at the silo. The financial implications of these two losses when combined, can be substantial, so mitigating against the risks of ear rots is a very important aspect of production.

While there are several different causal organisms for ear rot in maize, they all require the fulfilment of what is commonly termed the ‘disease triangle’ for infection to take place. When all three corners of the triangle are present simultaneously, then disease development can take place.

Diagram 1. The Disease Triangle. When all three corners of the triangle are present (the overlap of the circles) then the disease can occur.

The disease triangle above in Diagram 1. indicates the three factors that must be present for infection to be able to take place. Thus, the factor at each corner presents as an opportunity to manage disease development. The host plant (maize hybrid), the presence or absence of the pathogen, and the environmental conditions each provide a unique chance to get ahead of a potential problem.

The three main ear rot pathogens that occur most commonly in South Africa are Gibberella ear rot, Diplodia ear rot and Fusarium ear rot. Sporadic outbreaks of at least some of these diseases with varying severity occur in most seasons. The environmental conditions favourable for Gibberella infection are prolonged cool wet weather within three weeks of the onset of silking. Diplodia is favoured by a dry early season, followed by extended wet conditions at silking. Fusarium eat rot generally occurs as a secondary infection associated with insect damage on the ears.

A .B. C.

Pictures A, B and C: Pictures of the three most common ear rots, Picture A is Diplodia ear rot, B is Fusarium ear rot and C is Gibberella ear rot.

Spreading planting dates and using hybrids from a range of growth classes can help mitigate against both Gibberella and Diplodia ear rots because of their strong link to environmental conditions for infection to take place. A range of planting dates and growth classes will widen the window during which silking will occur and help mitigate risk. Using Bt containing hybrids or good chemical control of chewing insects from silking to R5 can reduce the impact of Fusarium ear rot, which is often associated with an insect feeding on the ears.

Hybrid selection can also be used to reduce the risk of ear rots. Most seed companies will be able to give at least some indication of hybrid susceptibility to these more common ear rots. By balancing the risks of these diseases with the attributes of hybrids in a package, the risk of significant crop loss due to ear rots can be reduced. As previously mentioned, hybrid growth classes should also be considered to help spread the risk.

Taking the pathogens into account, reduction of inoculum levels in the lands is an important tool in managing the risk of infection. Over-wintering of the pathogens occurs in the crop residues. Practices such as tillage, to break down the crop residues and crop rotation to non-host crops, can bring down the risk of problems in future maize crops.

For more information on ear rot diseases and diseases in general, click on the Disease Fact Sheets tab at www.pannar.com.